Open Access Research Article

A systematic review of Metaverse environment

Authors

  • Asif Zaman * Computer Science and Engineering, American International University, Bangladesh.
  • Mushfiqur Rahman Abir Computer Science and Engineering, American International University, Bangladesh.
  • Tanjil Hasan Sakib Computer Science and Engineering, American International University, Bangladesh.
  • Asgor Hossain Reaj Computer Science and Engineering, American International University, Bangladesh.

https://doi.org/10.22105/metaverse.v1i1.17

Abstract

The rise of the metaverse, a blend of virtual and augmented realities, opens vast possibilities for social engagement, economic transactions, and digital innovation. However, establishing a reliable metaverse involves significant technical and ethical hurdles. From a technical perspective, creating the metaverse necessitates a robust infrastructure, including high-speed internet, advanced hardware, and scalable platforms capable of supporting many simultaneous users. Key challenges include ensuring interoperability among various systems and maintaining cybersecurity to protect user data and privacy. On the ethical front, the metaverse must tackle issues related to digital identity, inclusivity, and equitable access, striving to bridge digital divides and ensure the representation of diverse demographics. Furthermore, there is a need to develop measures to combat misinformation, harassment, and digital addiction, which requires robust governance frameworks. This paper delves into these complex challenges, advocating for a multi-stakeholder approach that brings together policymakers, technologists, and ethicists to establish comprehensive standards and regulations. By addressing both the technical and ethical aspects, the objective is to create a metaverse that is secure, inclusive, and advantageous for all users.

Keywords

Metaverse Trust Privacy Security Ethics
References (59)
  1. [1] Moneta, A. (2020). Architecture, heritage, and the metaverse. Traditional dwellings and settlements review, 32(1), 37–49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27074915

  2. [2] Díaz, J. E. M., Saldaña, C. A. D., & Avila, C. A. R. (2020). Virtual world as a resource for hybrid education. International journal of emerging technologies in learning, 15(15), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i15.13025

  3. [3] Wang, Y., Su, Z., Zhang, N., Xing, R., Liu, D., Luan, T. H., & Shen, X. (2023). A survey on metaverse: Fundamentals, security, and privacy. IEEE communications surveys and tutorials, 25(1), 319–352. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2022.3202047

  4. [4] Duan, H., Li, J., Fan, S., Lin, Z., Wu, X., & Cai, W. (2021). Metaverse for social good: A university campus prototype [presentation]. Proceedings of the 29th ACM international conference on multimedia (pp. 153–161). https://doi.org/10.1145/3474085.3479238

  5. [5] Park, S. M., & Kim, Y. G. (2022). A metaverse: Taxonomy, components, applications, and open challenges. IEEE access, 10, 4209–4251. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3140175

Article Metrics

How to Cite

Zaman, A., Abir, M. R., Sakib, T. H., & Reaj, A. H. . (2024). A systematic review of Metaverse environment. Metaversalize, 1(4), 171-190. https://doi.org/10.22105/metaverse.v1i1.17

Similar Articles

1-10 of 45

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)